Demo report — fictional business, fictional data
A completed Profit Recovery Plan, before you upload anything.
This is what Profit Leak AI produces after a scan: a ranked set of findings, the evidence behind each one, the calculation used, and the action to take first. Every number on this page belongs to “Northgate Trading Co.”, a fictional business.
Estimated annual profit opportunity
$48,600
Conservative, annualised, modelled from the transactions below.
Identified costs
$214,800
Actual annualised spend across flagged categories.
Review value
$63,200
Spend that deserves review where a saving cannot responsibly be estimated.
Ranked profit leaks
Highest impact first, with the reasoning attached.
01 · Software & subscriptions
Six overlapping software subscriptions
Confidence: HighEffort: LowEstimated annual impact
$14,400
Identified cost $21,600
- Evidence
- Three project-management tools and two file-storage tools billed every month for 11 consecutive months, with two of them last increasing seats 14 months ago.
- Recommended action
- Consolidate onto one project tool and one storage tool, then cancel the four remaining licences at the next renewal date.
- How it was calculated
- Annualised from 11 observed monthly charges. Estimated impact assumes the four lowest-usage tools are removed.
02 · Suppliers & purchasing
Primary supplier pricing drifted 9.4% in two quarters
Confidence: MediumEffort: MediumEstimated annual impact
$18,700
Identified cost $92,400
- Evidence
- Average invoice value rose from $7,180 to $7,855 across the last two quarters with no change in order frequency or volume.
- Recommended action
- Open a pricing review with a benchmark quote from one alternative supplier before the next order cycle.
- How it was calculated
- Difference between recent-period and prior-period average unit cost, annualised, discounted for negotiation uncertainty.
03 · Payment processing
Card processing rate above current market band
Confidence: MediumEffort: LowEstimated annual impact
$9,200
Identified cost $46,300
- Evidence
- Blended processing cost of 2.41% across 3,940 settled transactions, with no volume-tier change since the account opened.
- Recommended action
- Request a volume-based rate review, using the last 12 months of settled volume as leverage.
- How it was calculated
- Modelled reduction to the low end of the observed rate range for this settlement volume.
04 · Duplicate payments
Two duplicate payments to the same vendor
Confidence: HighEffort: LowEstimated annual impact
$6,300
Identified cost $6,300
- Evidence
- Identical amounts and references paid 4 days apart in March, and again in August, to the same supplier.
- Recommended action
- Request credit notes for both duplicates and add a duplicate-reference check to payment approval.
- How it was calculated
- Actual observed duplicate amounts. No estimation applied.
05 · Financing & fees
Dormant facility and legacy service fees
Confidence: Review onlyEffort: LowEstimated annual impact
Review only
Identified cost $48,200
- Evidence
- A monthly facility fee and two legacy service charges continue with no corresponding activity in the period analysed.
- Recommended action
- Confirm internally whether each line is still required before cancelling — some may be contractually locked.
- How it was calculated
- Flagged as Review Value. A responsible saving cannot be estimated without knowing contract terms.
Your report will look like this — with your own numbers.
The free scan shows your headline opportunity and the number of findings. The Complete Profit Leak Audit unlocks every finding, its evidence, the calculation behind it and the full Profit Recovery Plan.
Illustrative example using fictional data. Not a projection, benchmark or guarantee of savings. Profit Leak AI is a decision-support tool and does not provide accounting, taxation, legal or financial advice.
